Wednesday, April 22, 2020

Thoughts on the 'History Hoax'


There are some in the conspiracy scene who hold that time has been added to, or deleted from, the chronological record of human experience. Some claim that less time has passed than has been recorded, some claim more. Some even claim that the calendar itself has been deceptively started up at some point in the past and that the vast majority of the calendar count has been falsified. Does this point of view hold up to logical scrutiny? 

The day, date and year constitute one of the fundamental forms of human knowledge, if not the fundamental form. Even the most brainwashed and idiotic person knows what year it is, and this is surely universal throughout time and space. What would it take to falsify such knowledge and introduce a new and different date and year to a population and how could this be done without any evidence of the fraud?

Without resorting to magical or science fictional means, is there any way to explain how the very year we live in could be altered? Even with the level of  technological prowess and mass brainwashing achieved by the current controllers, is there any conceivable way the population of even a single nation could be convinced that the year they are living in had changed, without future generations being aware of the change that had taken place? I can think of none. It would require a form of mass hypnosis that is simply impossible to conceive. Convincing people there is a deadly virus at loose or that terrorists flew planes into buildings is one thing, convincing them it's literally a different year today than it was yesterday is another thing entirely.

Some might say: ‘But in the past people were less educated, so they could be tricked more easily.’ But knowing the date and year is not a matter of education, it is fundamental to human experience regardless of education or even level of intelligence. A person would have to be severely intellectually disabled to not be aware of what year it is. This objection is also based on a misconception regarding the people who lived in the past. They were not dumber than us by virtue of being further back in history, they would have had their geniuses and their sceptics just like we do. And the idea that the common people were illiterate (even if that were true) and therefore had no awareness of the year they were living in does not stand up. Knowing what year it is does not require any form of literacy or education, it only requires that you live amongst other people who know what year it is and have the ability to communicate verbally. It is a form of knowledge that would be almost impossible to avoid.

Some will say: ‘But the dark ages! It would be easy to deceive people during such a period.’ Even if there was a ‘dark age’ in Europe (and this in dispute,) as long as there was some semblance of society and community (and I don’t think anyone is denying that) the calendar count, in particular the year, would have been maintained by the common people. Bear in mind also that our ancestors were much more connected to their own ancestors than we are today. They would remember well who had lived and died, and when. The same would go for their line of monarchs and the history of their diplomacy, conflicts and trade with neighboring countries. These things would not be easily forgotten the way things go down the memory hole in today’s world, and there would always have been those merchants, traders and explorers that kept records of their dealings and adventures in other lands, including dates and times. 

Anyway, how could one region of the world falsify its own history without other regions noticing? In my view this would be impossible. Europe was not setting the calendar count for the rest of the world, they were only half of Christendom. The other half, the East Roman, or Byzantine Empire experienced no dark age and the people were highly educated for their time. They passed their sacred Church calendar and chronology, which they shared with the west, onto the Russian empire before being overcome by the muslims, and so even without Europe and its so-called dark ages, our calendar was maintained throughout time by the eastern Christians. Unless the calendar fakery was a worldwide phenomenon perpetrated against all peoples everywhere at the same time, it simply could not be pulled off without someone noticing.

Another objection to my contention that calendar fakery is impossible is to point to the change from the Julian to Gregorian calendar in 1752. Some people say: ‘See! They changed the calendar, it is possible.’ Of course, our awareness of the change refutes the idea that this was analogous to a deceptive insertion or deletion of time. The reality is, it would have been impossible for that change to have taken place without the people of the time, and future generations, being aware of it.

So, I will end with a question; a challenge to those who hold to a calendar fakery view of history: 

‘By what means was the population, even of a particular region on the earth, tricked into thinking the year had changed, and how was this deception kept from the people who lived subsequently?’

Please comment below if you have an answer to this question or wish to add to the discussion in any other way.